Bryant

Bryant v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20253:25-cv-00724California2,088 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON ANDRE BRYANT, Case No.: 25-cv-0724-AJB (KSC)

CDCR #BV-8320,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and

WARDEN GUZMAN, CHIEF DEPUTY

WARDEN ESQUIEL, CAPTAIN (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH HOPPER and PLANT OPERATOR LEAVE TO AMEND PURSUANT TO BEATTY, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b) Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiff Shannon Andre Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) Plaintiff alleges that while playing basketball at Centinela State Prison in Imperial, California, he stepped on a crack and sprained his ankle due to the Defendants’ negligent maintenance of the basketball court. (See id. at 3.) I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.