Welpath

(PC) Rosner v. Welpath

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20251:24-cv-01145California1,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

24 To recap, Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on September 26, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) 25 On October 31, 2024, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a 26 cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF 27 No. 7.) 28 Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the October 31, 2024 order. Therefore, on January 7, 2025, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) On January 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) On January 24, 2025, the Court discharged the order to show cause and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) After Plaintiff again failed to file an amended complaint, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff failed to respond to March 6, 2025, order to show cause. Therefore, on April 1, 2025, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations recommending the action be dismissed for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.