CDCR
(PC) Howard v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS HOWARD, No. 1:24-cv-01335-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION CDCR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 8, 9) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
19 On March 7, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found 20 that Plaintiff stated the following cognizable claims: (1) excessive force against Defendants Lee, 21 Rios, Perez, and Reyes; (2) failure to intervene claim against Defendants Rios, Perez, and Reyes; 22 (3) state law claims of assault, battery, and negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, 23 and violation of the Bane Act against Defendants Lee, Rios, Perez, and Reyes; (4) retaliation 24 against Defendant Lee for…