Marzan

(PC) Kendrid v. Marzan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20252:22-cv-02301California1,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:22-cv-2301 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

MARZAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former civil detainee, proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 3, 2024, this Court ordered plaintiff to file a status report within thirty days, and this order was re-served on plaintiff on November 19, 2024. (ECF No. 40.) Multiple months have passed, and plaintiff has still not filed a status report. As discussed below, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. I. BACKGROUND On November 30, 2023, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 31.) The parties were advised that failure to comply with the order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of Court may result in the dismissal of the action. (Id. at 2.) On June 27, 2024, the Court issued a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.