Hunter

(PC) Ainsworth v. Hunter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20252:24-cv-01347California3,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRELL AINSWORTH, No. 2:24-cv-1347 DAD CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

R. HUNTER, Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are defendant Hunter’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and plaintiff’s motion for extension of time. (ECF Nos. 37, 39.) For the following reasons, this Court recommends that defendant Hunter’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be granted. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time is denied as unnecessary. II. LIFTING OF STAY On February 28, 2025, this Court granted defendant Hunter’s motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project and granted defendant Hunter thirty days to file a response to plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 36.) On March 21,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.