United States v. Demario Edwards

Good Law
734 F.3d 850·2013 WL 4105532·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16936
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 201312-10204California1,847 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

DeMario Edwards appeals his 46-month sentence following a guilty plea for possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) & 924(a)(2). The principal issue on appeal is the constitutionality of a provision of the federal Sentencing Guidelines that assigns criminal history points for crimes that were committed when the defendant was a juvenile. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4A1.2(d)(2)(A). Edwards contends that considering such crimes in sentencing adults is contrary to the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment cases limiting the degree of criminal punishment of juveniles. See Miller v. Alabama, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012); Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 , 130 S.Ct. 2011 , 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010); Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005). Joining the unanimously held view of our sister circuits, we conclude that the Eighth Amendment permits courts to use prior juvenile convictions to increase the sentence of an adult convicted of a crime.

Edwards further challenges the district court’s finding that his prior conviction for attempted burglary under Nevada law was a “crime of violence” under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.