Hien Nguyen v. John Phelan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202523-55632California1,786 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HIEN THI NGUYEN, No. 23-55632

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-04327-VAP-AS v.

JOHN PHELAN, in his official capacity as MEMORANDUM* Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Hien Nguyen, a woman of Vietnamese national origin,

appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying in part her motion to compel,

(2) denying reconsideration of her motion for a discovery extension, (3) striking

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). her untimely exhibits in opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.