Bondi

De La Rosa Lemus De Herrera v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202523-2961California723 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENDY MARISOL DE LA ROSA No. 23-2961 LEMUS DE HERRERA; N.A.-H.R.; H.S.- Agency Nos.

H.R.; G.A.S.-H.R., A220-684-452

A220-150-880

Petitioners,

A220-150-881

A220-150-882

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge.***

Petitioners Wendy Marisol De La Rosa Lemus De Herrera (“De La Rosa

Lemus De Herrera”) and her minor children (collectively, “Petitioners”) petition

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.