People v. Dakin CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/11/25 P. v. Dakin CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Yuba) ----
THE PEOPLE, C101894
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF24-01122- 01) v.
RICHARD THOMAS DAKIN, SR.,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Richard Thomas Dakin, Sr., filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable errors that would result in a disposition more favorable to Dakin, we will affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND1
Early in the morning on May 11, 2024, law enforcement saw a Mazda RX-8 without a rear license plate…