Zea-Ramos
Zea-Ramos v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-1408California688 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KAROL JENNIFER ZEA-RAMOS; JUAN No. 24-1408 MANUEL AMAYA-AGUIRRE; JOSBA Agency Nos.
MICHAEL AMAYA-ZEA, A240-742-058
A240-742-057
Petitioners,
A240-742-059
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 7, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Karol Jennifer Zea Ramos (“Zea Ramos”) and her family (collectively,
“Petitioners”) are natives and citizens of Peru who seek review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and…