Zea-Ramos

Zea-Ramos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-1408California688 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAROL JENNIFER ZEA-RAMOS; JUAN No. 24-1408 MANUEL AMAYA-AGUIRRE; JOSBA Agency Nos.

MICHAEL AMAYA-ZEA, A240-742-058

A240-742-057

Petitioners,

A240-742-059

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Karol Jennifer Zea Ramos (“Zea Ramos”) and her family (collectively,

“Petitioners”) are natives and citizens of Peru who seek review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.