Bondi

Villazana Cuevas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-2707California1,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENDA KARINA VILLAZANA No. 24-2707 CUEVAS; L. A. G. V., Agency Nos.

A215-822-526

Petitioners, A215-822-527 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Brenda Karina Villazana Cuevas (“Petitioner”) and her minor son1 are

citizens of Mexico who petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The minor child is a derivative beneficiary of Villazana Cuevas’s applications for relief. (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) (collectively, the

“agency”), denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.