Rodriguez-Gomez

Rodriguez-Gomez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-1340California930 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUANITA AZUCENA RODRIGUEZ- No. 24-1340 GOMEZ; A.S.A.-L.R., Agency Nos.

A220-152-479

Petitioners, A220-152-480 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 9, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge.***

Petitioners Juanita Azucena Rodriguez-Gomez and her child, natives and

citizens of Guatemala, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.