Bondi

Duenas Rosales v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-3421California997 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCIA IVETTE DUENAS No. 24-3421 ROSALES; M.J.-L.D.; N.E.-L.D., Agency Nos.

A216-269-203

Petitioners, A216-269-204

A216-269-205

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 9, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge.***

Petitioners Lucia Ivette Duenas Rosales (“Duenas Rosales”) and her two

minor children (collectively, “Petitioners”), citizens of El Salvador, petition for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. review of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.