Shaw

United States v. Shaw

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-4957California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4957 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:20-cr-00061-HDM-CSD-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

AARON SHAW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Shaw appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for a

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly determined Shaw was ineligible for a sentence

reduction because Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 821 did not lower his

guideline range.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.