Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-9California717 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 11 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PRABHJOT SINGH; TOSHA No. 24-
RANI; G.S.,
Agency Nos. Petitioners, A241-729-924
A241-729-943
v. A241-729-944
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 9, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Prabhjot Singh, Tosha Rani, and their son G.S.—all natives and citizens of
India—petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision
dismissing their appeal from the denial of their applications for asylum and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny
the…