Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202524-9California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 11 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRABHJOT SINGH; TOSHA No. 24-

RANI; G.S.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A241-729-924

A241-729-943

v. A241-729-944

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Prabhjot Singh, Tosha Rani, and their son G.S.—all natives and citizens of

India—petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision

dismissing their appeal from the denial of their applications for asylum and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.