Kisliuk
Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 DANIEL KISLIUK, Case No. 24-cv-03440-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 33, 34, 38, 54, 55 CITY OF FORT BRAGG, et al., Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court is the motion (Dkt. 33) of Defendants Bernie Norvell, City of Fort Bragg, Thomas O’Neal, Tyler Baker, Padraic Ferris, Jonathan McLaughlin, and Neil Cervenka (collectively, “City Defendants”) to dismiss Plaintiff Daniel Kisliuk’s second amended complaint (Dkt. 30). Defendants Mendocino County and Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office (collectively, “County Defendants”) have also so moved (Dkts. 34, 38), as have County employees Eloise Kelsey, Eldon Johnston, and Stephen Bohner1 (Dkt. 54) and Mendocino County Superior Court Judge Clayton Brennan (Dkt. 55). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the…