An

TrustLabs, Inc. v. An

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20253:21-cv-02606California247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TRUSTLABS, INC., Case No. 21-cv-02606-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v.

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER

RULE 54(b) DANIEL JAIYONG AN, Defendant.

Plaintiff TrustLabs, Inc. moves for an entry of final judgment and a judgment of $8,203.79 against Defendant Daniel Jaiyong An under Rule 54(b). Mot. (dkt. 162). TrustLabs contends that the Court’s prior order granting summary judgment for TrustLabs warrants this outcome because the Court found that TrustLabs had shown that it suffered over $6,000 in damages based on An’s conduct. Id. at 3; see also MSJ Order (dkt. 150) at 4 (concluding that TrustLabs had met the $6,000 damages threshold for statutory standing). But the Court did not grant summary judgment with respect to damages under California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. MSJ Order at 8. And for good reason: the question whether a plaintiff has satisfied their statutory standing requirements is distinct from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.