Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA), Inc. v. Zipline International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20253:22-cv-04480California1,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS & Case No. 22-cv-04480-JSC

RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (SARA), INC.,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: SEALING OF THE COURT’S PRIOR ORDERS v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 258, 261

ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

11 Defendant.

12 The Court previously ruled on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and Daubert motions, and provisionally docketed its Orders under seal, granting the parties the opportunity to designate which portions of the Orders should remain sealed. (Dkt Nos. 257, 258, 260, 261.) SARA did not designate any portions of the Orders for sealing and Zipline seeks to seal portions of both motions. (Dkt. Nos. 259, 265.) The Court now GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Zipline’s designations to seal portions of the Court’s Orders. The Court begins with “a strong presumption in favor of access to court records.” Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). Zipline…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.