Maganola
Jeremy Delphin v. Maganola
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEREMY DELPHIN, Case No. 2:22-cv-02997-JWH (DFM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
MAGANOLA et al., JUDGE
Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the grant of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (ECF No. 81.) Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration (ECF No. 82), which is construed as objections to the Report, do not merit a change to the Report’s findings or recommendations. Plaintiff objects that the Supremacy Clause was violated when prison correctional officers forged or threw out Plaintiff’s grievance, so as to leave out Plaintiff’s allegations of sexual and physical assaults. (ECF No. 82 at 1-3.) The Supreme Clause, however, “is not…