Maganola

Jeremy Delphin v. Maganola

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20252:22-cv-02997California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY DELPHIN, Case No. 2:22-cv-02997-JWH (DFM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

MAGANOLA et al., JUDGE

Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the grant of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (ECF No. 81.) Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration (ECF No. 82), which is construed as objections to the Report, do not merit a change to the Report’s findings or recommendations. Plaintiff objects that the Supremacy Clause was violated when prison correctional officers forged or threw out Plaintiff’s grievance, so as to leave out Plaintiff’s allegations of sexual and physical assaults. (ECF No. 82 at 1-3.) The Supreme Clause, however, “is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.