Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20251:21-cv-01461California7,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ MOTIONS

IN LIMINE

v. (ECF Nos. 215, 243) ANDERSON, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently set for jury trial on April 29, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motions in limine, filed on February 21, 2025, and Defendants’ motions in limine, filed on March 11, 2025. (ECF Nos. 215, 243.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motions in limine on March 24, 2025, and Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motions in limine on March 25, 2025. (ECF Nos. 255, 258.) Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendants’ opposition on April 10, 2025. (ECF No. 280.) I. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.