Mekka Edwards v. The County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20252:24-cv-01736California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-01736-MWF (MAAx) Date: April 9, 2025 Title: Mekka Edwards et al v. The County of Los Angeles et al

Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The purpose of this Order to Show Cause is to determine whether Defendants County of Los Angeles, Hilda L. Solis, Janice Hanh, Kathryn Barger, Sheila Kuehl, and Mark Ridley-Thomas have abandoned their defense of this action. On January 27, 2025, the Court issued an Order denying in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Docket No. 51 (“Prior Order”)). The Prior Order further directed Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) by February 28, 2025, and Defendants to file an Answer or respond to the SAC, if filed, on or before March 28, 2025. (Id. at 14). As of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed an SAC, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.