Carrasco

Carrasco v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20253:24-cv-02471California3,407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO CARRASCO, Case No. 24-cv-2471-MMA-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

T-MOBILE USA, INC. et al., [Doc. No. 6] Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Mario Carrasco initiated this employment action against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”), Anna Argast, and Does 1 through 50, in the California State Court, Cal. Sup. Ct. Case No. 24CU025147C, asserting various violations of the California Labor Code, Doc. No. 1-4 (“Compl.”). On December 27, 2024, T-Mobile removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Doc. No. 1 (“Notice of Removal” or “NOR”). Plaintiff now moves to remand the action back to state court. Doc. No. 6. T- Mobile filed a response in opposition to the motion to remand, to which Plaintiff replied. Doc. Nos. 9, 10. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.