In re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20254:19-cv-00717California1,160 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 19-cv-00717-JST
IN RE CALIFORNIA BAIL BOND
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE
CORPORATION AND AMERICAN
SURETY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE
This order relates to: PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
ALL ACTIONS Re: ECF No. 536
13 14 Before the Court is Defendants Lexington National Insurance Corporation (“Lexington”) and American Surety Company’s (“ASC”) (together, “Moving Defendants”) motion for relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order of a magistrate judge. ECF No. 536. Moving Defendants ask the Court to reverse Judge Ryu’s order denying Moving Defendants’ clawback motion. ECF No. 533. The Court will deny the motion. “A non-dispositive order entered by a magistrate must be deferred to unless it is ‘clearly erroneous or contrary to law.’” Grimes v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco,…