Hightower

Hightower v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20255:20-cv-03639California7,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 IN RE TELESCOPES ANTITRUST Case No. 5:20-cv-03639-EJD

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

FINAL APPROVAL; GRANTING

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,

EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARDS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 398, 404

Before the Court is Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ (“IPPs”) Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Attorney Fees, Expenses, and Service Awards. ECF Nos. 398, 404. Four pro se objectors and two represented by counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiff class (“DPPs”) in a separate case before this Court oppose approval of the Settlement Agreement. ECF Nos. 399, 400, 401, 402, 403. The Court held a Fairness Hearing on April 3, 2025, where all parties and DPP objectors were heard. Having considered the motion briefing, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the objections and response thereto, the arguments of counsel,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.