Maner

(PC) Vasquez v. Maner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20251:24-cv-00862California361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK VASQUEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00862-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO THE

v. PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

D. MANER, (ECF No. 28) Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983.

19 On April 10, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice 20 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been 21 resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 28.) 22 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 23 without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 24 appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 25 automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.