Hodge

Hodge v. Travel + Leisure Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20255:24-cv-06116California2,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 VERNICKY V. HODGE, Case No. 5:24-cv-06116-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

TRAVEL + LEISURE CO., Re: ECF No. 41 Defendant.

After the Court dismissed Plaintiff Vernicky Hodge’s claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and a California debt collection law, Hodge filed an amended complaint. She renewed her TCPA claim, but she dropped her California claim and replaced it with a claim under Florida’s debt collection law: the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (Florida Act). Defendant Travel + Leisure Co. again moves to dismiss. Satisfied that Hodge has now met her pleading burden, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Hodge is a California resident who previously purchased timeshare properties from Defendant between 2018 and 2019. Second Am. Compl. (SAC) ¶¶ 4, 10, ECF No. 38. As a timeshare owner, Hodge must make regular payments on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.