Jack

Jack v. Sundberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20253:25-cv-00485California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUSTIN JAMES JACK, Case No. 25-cv-00485-JSC

Plaintiff,

DISMISSAL ORDER

v.

CHRISTINA SUNDBERG, et al., Defendants.

12 On January 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Christina Sundberg, Yuhuang Li, and Evergreen Cemetery. (Dkt. No. 1.) That same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 2.) On January 21, 2025, the Court denied without prejudice Plaintiff’s IFP application because it lacked sufficient detail. (Dkt. No. 5.) The Court set February 11, 2025 as the deadline for Plaintiff to file another IFP application that provided additional detail and clarified the ambiguities identified in the Court’s order. (Id.) Plaintiff did not file another IFP application by the February 11, 2025 deadline. So, on February 18, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP. (Dkt. No. 6.) The order stated “[i]f Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee by March 5, 2025, the Court will dismiss this case …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.