Fossum

Fossum v. Lamm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20251:24-cv-01374California1,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TIMOTHY SCOTT FOSSUM, Case No. 1:24-cv-01374-JLT-SAB 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF v. ACTION 12 BRIAN LAMM, et al., (ECF Nos. 12, 13) 13 Defendants. 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this § 1983 action. (ECF No. 10.) On November 15, 2024, the Court screened the initial complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and found that it failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted. (ECF No. 7.) The Court explained the deficiencies in the complaint and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days of receiving the Court’s order. (Id.) On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint, which the Court screened and found that Plaintiff had again failed to state a claim. (ECF No. 12.) The Court construed that Plaintiff might be seeking to bring claims of excessive force and failure to protect or provide medical treatment, gave Plaintiff the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.