Cates

(PC) Walker v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20251:25-cv-00409California1,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORMAIN LAMAR WALKER, No. 1:25-cv-00409 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY:

v. (1) THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT BE B. CATES, et al., SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR FAILURE

TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

Defendants. REMEDIES, AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE

IN FOURTEEN DAYS

20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 21 has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 22 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 23 636(b)(1)(B). 24 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why: (1) this matter 25 should not be summarily dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.