Newsom

(PC) Hill v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20252:19-cv-01680California7,825 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HILL, No. 2:19-cv-1680 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without a lawyer in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are the parties’ ten requests and motions. ECF Nos. 134 (plaintiff’s request for settlement conference); 136 (defendants’ motions to compel and for sanctions); 137 (plaintiff’s motion to compel); 138 (plaintiff’s motion for copy of deposition video and transcript); 139 (plaintiff’s motion for sanctions); 144 (plaintiff’s supplemental motion for sanctions), 145 (plaintiff’s motion to terminate or limit deposition and motion for protective order); 146 (plaintiff’s motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order); 148 (plaintiff’s motion for order to view deposition video); and 150 (defendants’ motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order). For the reasons discussed below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.