Wallace

Wallace v. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20252:24-cv-02459California3,832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATISHA WALLACE, No. 2:24-cv-02459-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

MEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., (Doc. No. 8) Defendant.

16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Solano County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 8.) On October 31, 2024, the motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 10.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion to remand. BACKGROUND On August 6, 2024, plaintiff Natisha Wallace filed this putative class action against her employer, defendant Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. (“defendant”), and unnamed defendants Does 1–100, in the Solano County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1-1 at 5.) In her complaint, plaintiff asserts the following nine causes of action: (1) failure to pay overtime wages in violation of California Labor Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.