Yang Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
537 F. App'x 763
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 201311-71405California249 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yang Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Chen contends the police persecuted him based on an actual and/or imputed political opinion. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Chen failed to show a protected ground was at least one central reason for the harm he suffered or fears suffering upon return. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir.2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”); cf. Hu v. Holder, 652 F.3d 1011, 1018-19 (9th Cir.2011) (IJ’s conclusion not supported by substantial evidence where police accused petitioner of acting against the government and Communist party). We reject Chen’s contention that the BIA failed to consider whether he was harmed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.