United States v. Jose Davalos-Martinez

Good Law
537 F. App'x 773
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 201312-50268California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Fermin Davalos-Martinez (“Davalos”) appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to one count of attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

The district court did not err in denying Davalos’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on the alleged invalidity of the 1993 deportation order, because the supersed ing indictment was based solely on the 2002 deportation, which is separate and independent from the 1993 deportation. As Davalos concedes, the 2002 deportation did not reinstate the prior deportation order. Cf. United States v. Anas-Ordonez, 597 F.3d 972, 982 (9th Cir.2010) (holding that none of the subsequent deportation orders provide an independent basis for conviction of illegal reentry where the subsequent orders merely reinstated an invalid deportation order). Instead, the 2002 deportation was based on Davalos’s entry into the United States on or after February 18, 1993 without being “admitted or paroled after inspection by an Immigration Officer.” Because Davalos’s reentry without being admitted or paroled “constituted a deportable offense in its own right,” the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.