United States v. John Smith, II
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202523-30036California690 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-30036
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cr-00086-SLG-1 v. 3:16-cr-00086-SLG
JOHN PEARL SMITH II,
MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 13, 2025 Seattle, Washington
Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge.
John Pearl Smith II appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to
dismiss the superseding indictment. The District of Alaska failed to implement the
geographic proration formula required under its 2015 Jury Plan. Smith argues that
this failure deprived him of his right to a grand jury that represented a fair cross-
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United…