Chipunov
United States v. Chipunov
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2046 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:22-cr-01268-W-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
GEORGIY CHIPUNOV,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 28, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Georgiy Chipunov was convicted by a jury for a bomb hoax
under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1038(a)(1) and 844(i) after he made two 911 calls reporting,
“there’s a bomb in the courthouse.” Chipunov appeals the conviction on the
grounds that the indictment and the jury instructions did not properly include the
subjective mens rea for a “true threat,” as mandated by Counterman v. Colorado,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 600 U.S. 66 (2023), and that the government failed to present sufficient…