Bondi

Romero Calderon v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202524-1578California772 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCIS PAMELA ROMERO No. 24-1578 CALDERON; A.E.D.R.; V.S.D.R., Agency Nos.

A206-434-907

Petitioners, A206-434-908

A206-434-909

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 10, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and SIMON, District Judge.***

Petitioners Francis Romero Calderon (Romero Calderon) and two of her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. minor children, A.E.D.R. and V.S.D.R., are natives and citizens of Honduras.

Petitioners seek review of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.