Lozada-Moreno

Lozada-Moreno v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202524-2256California776 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE CIRILO LOZADA-MORENO, No. 24-2256 Agency No. Petitioner, A091-530-006 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.***

Petitioner Jose Cirilo Lozada-Moreno (Lozada-Moreno) seeks review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jane Magnus-Stinson, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion to reopen his 1993 removal

proceedings. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.