McClune

McClune v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202524-2911California1,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTHA MCCLUNE, No. 24-2911 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-05017-AJR v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California A. Joel Richlin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Martha McClune appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of McClune’s

application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits under the Social

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Security Act (“SSA”), 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. McClune applied for SSI benefits…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.