People v. Murry CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Murry in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. Appointed counsel advised Murry on December 13, 2024 that he could personally submit any contentions or issues he wanted the court to consider. Appointed counsel also sent Murry the transcripts of the record on appeal and a copy of the appellate brief. On December 16, 2024 this court also notified Murry that he could submit a supplemental brief within 30 days stating any grounds for appeal, contentions, or arguments he wanted us to consider. Despite granting Murry two extensions of time in which to file a supplemental brief, we received no response from Murry. We have examined the record and are satisfied appellate counsel for Murry has complied with counsel’s responsibilities and there are no arguable issues. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 118- 119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

FEUER, J.

We concur:

MARTINEZ, P. J. SEGAL, J.

4