In re A.T.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2025D085053California5,626 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kelety, J.

Filed 4/14/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re A.T., a Person Coming Under D085053 the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH (Super. Ct. No. J519409)

AND HUMAN SERVICES

AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

W.M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Daniela A. Reali-Ferrari, Judge. Affirmed. Jesse McGowan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Claudia G. Silva, County Counsel, Lisa M. Maldonado, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Natasha C. Edwards, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. W.M. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s October 18, 2024 dispositional order removing A.T. from the “physical custody” of M.T. (Mother) and Father pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 361, subdivisions (c) and (d), respectively. The court alternatively found, as to Father only, that it would be “detrimental” to place A.T. with him under section 361.2, subdivision (a). On appeal, Father argues (1) section 361, subdivision (d) applies in this case because, unlike…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.