In re A.T.
Opinion
Opinion
Kelety, J.
Filed 4/14/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re A.T., a Person Coming Under D085053 the Juvenile Court Law.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH (Super. Ct. No. J519409)
AND HUMAN SERVICES
AGENCY,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
W.M.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Daniela A. Reali-Ferrari, Judge. Affirmed. Jesse McGowan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Claudia G. Silva, County Counsel, Lisa M. Maldonado, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Natasha C. Edwards, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. W.M. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s October 18, 2024 dispositional order removing A.T. from the “physical custody” of M.T. (Mother) and Father pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 361, subdivisions (c) and (d), respectively. The court alternatively found, as to Father only, that it would be “detrimental” to place A.T. with him under section 361.2, subdivision (a). On appeal, Father argues (1) section 361, subdivision (d) applies in this case because, unlike…