Camilla Telluselle v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
538 F. App'x 750
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 201312-70149California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Camilla Telluselle, a native and citizen of Sweden, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and review de novo claims of due process violations. Hama-zaspyan v. Holder, 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Telluselle failed to maintain her F-l nonimmigrant status where she testified that she was not enrolled at Hawaii Pacific University or any other educational institution during the spring 2011 semester. See 8 C.F.R. § 214.2 (f)(5)® (describing requirements for maintaining foreign student status, including “pursuing a full course of study at an educational institution”). The agency therefore properly found Telluselle removable for failing to maintain her nonimmigrant status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(C)®.

Telluselle’s contention that she was denied due process during her removal proceedings is not supported by the record. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.