Ji Cao v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
537 F. App'x 754
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 201311-73621California203 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ji Hui Cao (“Cao”), a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010), and deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies between Cao’s testimony and his brother’s testimony regarding the circumstances of Cao’s wife’s forced sterilization. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable under totality of the circumstances). Because it is not the case that “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude” that Cao is credible, 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B), we uphold the agency’s adverse credibility determination. In the absence of credible testimony, Cao’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.