Schmidt

Schmidt v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20253:23-cv-00899California1,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 JENNIFER SCHMIDT, et al., Case No.: 23-cv-0899-W-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [DOC. 31] Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Defendants oppose. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. Civ.L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion [Doc. 31]. 23 I. BACKGROUND This lawsuit arises from the death of Plaintiffs’ father, Gilbert Gonzalo Gil, while in the custody of Defendant County of San Diego at the Vista Detention Facility (“VDF”). The allegations regarding Mr. Gill’s death are set forth in greater detail in this Court’s September 26, 2024 Order Denying In Part And Granting In Part Without Leave to Amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.