Dominguez

Dominguez v. Bachofer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20253:24-cv-02904California1,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIJAH DOMINGUEZ, Case No. 24-cv-02904-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. § 1915

MARK BACHOFER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 Defendants.

Elijah Dominguez, who is proceeding pro se without an attorney, initially brought Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”) retaliation claims against Mark Bachofer and Kerry Kip, librarians at the Contra Costa County Public Library. (Dkt. No. 1.) In a Screening Order issued on December 16, 2024, the Court determined that Dominguez failed to state any cognizable claims and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend to correct the identified deficiencies. (Dkt. No. 46.) Specifically, the Court found that the Complaint lacked “any allegations that Dominguez is a qualified individual with a disability” and “detail[s as to] what his complaint against the library was about or when it was made.” (Dkt. No. 46 at 3.) Dominguez timely filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) realleging his ADA claims and adding several new constitutional claims and a malicious prosecution claim against Kip and Bachofer. (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.