Freedom Forever Procurement LLC v. Silfab Solar Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20253:24-cv-02452California2,517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 FREEDOM FOREVER Case No.: 24-cv-2452 W (BLM)

PROCUREMENT LLC,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER 28 v. U.S.C. § 1406(a) AND RULE 12(b)(3) 16 [DOC. 8] SILFAB SOLAR INC. and SILFAB WA

INC.,

18 Defendants. 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendant Silfab Solar Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Freedom Forever Procurement LLC’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). [Doc. 8]. Plaintiff opposes. [Doc. 10]. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss [Doc. 8]. /// /// I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Freedom Forever Procurement (FFP) is a residential solar power company that works with independent authorized dealers to market its products to homeowners. (Compl. [Doc. 1] at ¶ 11.) To…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.