Hulet

Hulet v. County of Tuolumne

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20251:23-cv-01217California9,712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRANT HULET, No. 1:23-cv-01217-KES-HBK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, AND DENYING QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

TUOLUMNE COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, BILL POOLEY, CARL

BENSON, MARCUS GREEN,

SHAYLENE GRAZIOSE, JESSICA (Doc. 37) HOLT, SHELBY HEDGPETH, and DANIEL GAVRILAS, Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiff Grant Hulet brings this action against defendants County of Tuolumne, Tuolumne 21 County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Bill Pooley, and officers Carl Benson, Marcus Green, Shaylene 22 Graziose, Jessica Holt, Shelby Hedgpeth, and Daniel Gavrilas. Doc. 29 (“FAC”). Hulet alleges 23 that the officers used excessive force while he was in pretrial detention and injured him. Id. 24 Although Hulet alleges all individual defendants violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free 25 from excessive force, Hulet moves for summary judgment only as to conduct by officer Marcus 26 Green. Doc. 37…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.