Doerer

(PC) Lanier v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20251:24-cv-01178California2,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM LANIER, No. 1:24-cv-01178 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE” v. CONCERNING FAILURE TO EXHAUST J.DOERER, et al., (ECF No. 19) Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE

IN FOURTEEN DAYS 19 Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights 20 action seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of 21 Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (federal prisoner). The matter was referred to a United States 22 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 Before this Court are Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 20) along with his 24 unsolicited “motion to show cause” concerning his failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.