Farwana

Farwana v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20255:24-cv-07518California4,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 GHAZI FARWANA, Case No. 24-cv-07518-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND;

v. DIRECTING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT

TESLA, INC., BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION;

Defendant. AND DEFERRING RULING ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION [Re: ECF 8, 10]

14 Plaintiff Ghazi Farwana (“Farwana”) filed this action against his former employer, Defendant Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”), in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. The operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) asserts claims for workplace discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, and related misconduct, all under state law. Tesla removed the action to federal district court based on complete diversity of citizenship between Farwana and Tesla. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.