A.A.B.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 A.A.B., a minor, by and through his Case No. 1:25-cv-00261-EPG guardian ad litem, Dnieper Vegavillalobos, 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, v. PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CITY OF PORTERVILLE, et al., (ECF No. 14) Defendants.

16 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ proposed stipulated protective order. (ECF 17 No. 14). Upon review, the Court will deny, without prejudice, the request to enter the proposed 18 order. 19 Among other things, the proposed order fails to address Local Rule 141(c), which sets out 20 various requirements for a protective order. For example, the parties define confidential 21 information to mean “information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or 22 tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).” (ECF No. 14, p. 1). But such a definition improperly allows the parties to deem information…