(PC) Casity v. Amador County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD D. CASITY, No. 24-cv-02449-DC-CSK (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
AMADOR COUNTY, et al., THIS ACTION WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
Defendants. (Doc. No. 5)
17 Plaintiff Richard D. Casity is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 12, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without leave to amend. (Doc. No. 5 at 4.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found that Plaintiff cannot proceed with his claims regarding his criminal sentencing against named Defendant Amador County Superior Court Judge Renee Day because “[a] state judge is absolutely immune from civil liability for damages…